The Collier Report of U.S. Government Contracting

Old School Reporting Using Modern Technology

Information Systems Laboratories Inc

  • Information Systems Laboratories Inc

  • View government funding actions
  • Vienna, VA 22182
  • Phone: 858-535-9680
  • Estimated Number of Employees: 70
  • Estimated Annual Receipts: $21,341,210
  • Business Start Date: 1982
  • Contact Person: Margaret Latchman-geller
  • Contact Phone: 858-373-2717
  • Contact Email: mgeller@islinc.com
  • Business Structure:
  • Corporate Entity (Not Tax Exempt)
  • Business Type:
  • For Profit Organization
  • Industries Served: Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
  • Product Areas: R&D- DEFENSE SYSTEM: ELECTRONICS/COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT (APPLIED RESEARCH/EXPLORATORY DEVELOPMENT), R&D-ELECTRONICS & COMM EQ-A RES/EXP, R&D-ELECTRONICS & COMM EQ-ADV DEV, R&D- DEFENSE SYSTEM: ELECTRONICS/COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT (ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT), R&D- DEFENSE SYSTEM: ELECTRONICS/COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT (ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT), R&D-ELECTRONICS & COMM EQ-ENG DEV, R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: SERVICES (ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT), SERVICES (ADVANCED), PHYSICAL SCIENCES (ADVANCED), R&D- GENERAL SCIENCE/TECHNOLOGY: PHYSICAL SCIENCES (ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT), R&D-AERO & SPACE TECH-ADV DEV, R&D- SPACE: AERONAUTICS/SPACE TECHNOLOGY (ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT), R&D- SPACE: AERONAUTICS/SPACE TECHNOLOGY (ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT), R&D-AERO & SPACE TECH-ENG DEV, R&D- OTHER TRANSPORTATION: TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT), R&D-TRANS-TRAFFIC MGT-MGMT SUP, R&D-TRANS-TRAFFIC MGT-COMERCLIZ, R&D- OTHER TRANSPORTATION: TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (COMMERCIALIZED), TRANSPORTATION/TRAVEL/RELOCATION- TRANSPORTATION: SECURITY VEHICLE, SECURITY VEHICLE SERVICES

Sampling of Federal Government Funding Actions/Set Asides

In order by amount of set aside monies.

  • $79,941 - Friday the 23rd of June 2017
    National Aeronautics And Space Administration
    NASA HEADQUARTERS
    IGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTIONS. IDENTIFICATION OF R&M ASPECTS OF SYSTEM SAFETY. THESE SERVICES ARE REQUIRED TO FACILITATE NASA S DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDARD AND ASSOCIATED GUIDANCE DESCRIBING AN OBJECTIVES-DRIVEN, RISK-INFORMED APPROACH TO THE PLANNING AND EVALUATION OF PROGRAM AND PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PRODUCTS RELATED TO RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY, WHICH REPRESENT A SUBSET OF SYSTEM SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AS DEFINED IN THE NASA SYSTEM SAFETY HANDBOOK, NASA/SP-2010-576. BUILDING ON PRINCIPLES SET OUT IN THE HANDBOOK, THE DOCUMENTS WILL ESTABLISH REFERENCE OBJECTIVES SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO HARDWARE RELIABILITY, FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE, AND MAINTAINABILITY, AND ADDRESS WAYS IN WHICH THE OBJECTIVES CAN BE SATISFIED AND THEIR SATISFACTION CAN BE ESTABLISHED AS PART OF A PROGRAM OF SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES.
  • $601,201 - Friday the 10th of July 2015
    National Aeronautics And Space Administration
    NASA HEADQUARTERS
    IGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTIONS. VOLUME 2 OF NASA SYSTEM SAFETY HANDBOOK. THE PURPOSE OF THE SECOND VOLUME IS TO ELABORATE UPON THE FRAMEWORK AND CONCEPTS DEVELOPED IN VOLUME 1 IN SEVERAL AREAS, BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL RATIONALE, IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICS, AND PRACTICAL EXAMPLES. THE FOLLOWING LIST SUMMARIZES THE AREAS OF NEW TECHNICAL CONTENT THAT WILL BE ADDRESSED IN VOLUME 2: 1. SELECTION OF HIGH-LEVEL PROBABILISTIC SAFETY THRESHOLDS AND GOALS FOR WELL-DEFINED MISSIONS 2. ACHIEVEMENT OF AS SAFE AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE, (ASARP) FOR WELL-DEFINED MISSIONS 3. FORMULATION OF SAFETY OBJECTIVES FOR DESIGN CONCEPTS THAT EXIST WITHOUT SPECIFIED MISSIONS 4. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY OBJECTIVES FOR ABORT EFFECTIVENESS 5. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY OBJECTIVES FOR SOFTWARE INTEGRITY 6. SELECTION AND APPLICATION OF ANALYSIS METHODS WITHIN AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM SAFETY FRAMEWORK 7. FORMULATION OF THE RISK INFORMED SAFETY CASE (RISC) FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF PROGRAMS/PROJECTS 8. DOCUMENTATION AND DISPLAY OF RESULTS 9. INCORPORATION OF THE RISC INTO THE PROGRAM/PROJECT SYSTEM SAFETY PLAN (SSP) DESCRIPTIONS OF THE TASK TASK 1 CONSISTS OF 14 SUB-TASKS ORGANIZED INTO THE FOLLOWING THREE TYPES OF ACTIVITIES: DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EACH OF THE AREAS LISTED ABOVE PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT OF VOLUME 2 COVERING THE TOPICS LISTED ABOVE PREPARATION FOR AND PARTICIPATION IN A WORKSHOP COVERING VOLUME 2 AND FINAL PUBLICATION OF VOLUME 2
  • $50,000 - Friday the 16th of December 2011
    National Aeronautics And Space Administration
    NASA HEADQUARTERS
    THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RISK INFORMED DECISION MAKING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF NASA'S OFFICE OF SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE (OSMA).
  • $50,000 - Friday the 8th of March 2013
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
    SUPPORT FOR MITIGATING SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE INDEX (MSPI). DEOBLIGATION OF $60,000.
  • $45,000 - Monday the 11th of June 2012
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
    SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH CONSEQUENTIAL STEAM GENERATOR TUBE RUPTURE EVENTS
  • $40,015 - Monday the 5th of December 2011
    Department Of Air Force
    FA8750 AFRL RIK
    NEXT GENERATION ELINT PROCESSING
  • $35,000 - Friday the 15th of March 2013
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
    IMPROVEMENT IN TRACE CONTAINMENT MODELING TECHNIQUES
  • $32,156 - Thursday the 22nd of December 2011
    National Aeronautics And Space Administration
    NASA HEADQUARTERS
    THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RISK INFORMED DECISION MAKING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF NASA'S OFFICE OF SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE (OSMA).
  • $30,000 - Thursday the 19th of April 2012
    National Aeronautics And Space Administration
    NASA HEADQUARTERS
    THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RISK INFORMED DECISION MAKING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF NASA'S OFFICE OF SAFETY&MISSION ASSURANCE (OSMA).
  • $211,284 - Friday the 23rd of June 2017
    National Aeronautics And Space Administration
    NASA HEADQUARTERS
    IGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTIONS - AGENCY LEVEL SUPPORT IN STRATEGIC RISK MANAGEMENT AND SYSTEM SAFETY VISION/STANDARD. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK IS TO DEVELOP A FRAMEWORK THAT COMBINES ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) AT THE AGENCY LEVEL WITH THE BASELINE PERFORMANCE REVIEW (BPR) PROCESS; TO PROVIDE A POSITION PAPER ADDRESSING THE WAYS IN WHICH THE SYSTEM SAFETY (SS) OBJECTIVES AT NASA ARE EXPECTED TO CHANGE OVER THE NEXT 3, 5, AND 10 YEARS; TO DEVELOP A SYSTEM SAFETY STANDARD THAT FOCUSES ON OBJECTIVES BASED PRODUCTS AND INCORPORATES THE PRINCIPLE ELEMENTS OF THE SS HANDBOOK; AND TO REVIEW NASA S OTHER RELEVANT STANDARDS, INCLUDING BOTH ENGINEERING AND SAFETY STANDARDS, TO RECOMMEND A CONSISTENT OBJECTIVE-BASED APPROACH FOR DRAWING THEM TOGETHER.

© Copyright 2019
The Collier Report
published by 1918 Media LLC.
Information displayed in this dossier has been provided through available open source or public sources. No reliance should be made by readers or Collier Report subscribers. Funding actions are complicated and do not always represent dollar-for-dollar payments to vendors nor do they represent payments in certain instances. Requests for the modification of displayed information may be made to help.desk@1918.media.